HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sainju, U. M. Articles by Reddy, V. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sainju, U. M. Articles by Reddy, V. R. Agricola Articles by Sainju, U. M. Articles by Reddy, V. R.

Soil Nitrate-Nitrogen under Tomato following Tillage, Cover Cropping, and Nitrogen Fertilization

Agricultural Research Station, Fort Valley State Univ., 1005 State University Dr., Fort Valley, GA;

V. R. Reddy

USDA-ARS-NRI Remote Sensing and Modelling Lab., Beltsville, MD 20705.

^* Corresponding author (sainjuu{at}mail.fvsu.edu).

ABSTRACT

Management practices can influence NO₃-N content and movement in the soil. We examined the influence of 3 yr of tillage [no-till (NT), chisel (CH), and moldboard (MB)], cover crop [hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) (HV), and no hairy vetch (NHV)], and N fertilization (0, 90, and 180 kg N ha^–1) on residual NO₃-N content and movement on a Norfolk sandy loam (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic, Typic Kandiudults) under tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) in central Georgia. Because of low N recovery by tomato, NO₃-N content in the soil increased with depth, regardless of treatments, and ranged from 127 to 316 kg ha^–1 at 0- to 120-cm depth in the fall (September 1997). The content increased with increasing rate of N addition from cover crop residue and N fertilizer. From fall to spring (March 1998), 22 to 58% (37 to 129 kg NO₃-N ha^–1) of this content was lost, mostly due to leaching. Greater loss occurred in NT than in CH or MB, with HV than with NHV, and with 180 or 90 than with 0 kg N ha^–1. Similarly, greater loss at 0- to 60-cm than at 60- to 120-cm depth and significant correlation between soil NO₃-N and clay concentration with depth indicates that NO₃-N moved from the surface layer to the underlying clay layer, where it moved slowly. Nitrate-N content and movement in the soil from cover crop residue and N fertilizer were similar. Minimum tillage reduced NO₃-N movement compared with NT, yet avoided the negative effects on soil and water quality associated with MB. Although HV increased tomato N uptake and recovery, it was not effective in reducing NO₃-N content and movement compared with N fertilizer.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. M. Sainju and B. P. Singh Nitrogen Storage with Cover Crops and Nitrogen Fertilization in Tilled and Nontilled Soils Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 619 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. M. Sainju, B. P. Singh, W. F. Whitehead, and S. Wang Accumulation and Crop Uptake of Soil Mineral Nitrogen as Influenced by Tillage, Cover Crops, and Nitrogen Fertilization Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 682 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]