JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 3:238-243 (1974)
© 1974 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by King, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, H. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by King, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, H. D.

Nitrogen Movement Resulting from Surface Application of Liquid Sewage Sludge1

Larry D. King and H. D. Morris2

ABSTRACT

One of the factors limiting the rate at which sewage sludge can be applied to soil is the speed at which inorganic N is formed and the fate of that inorganic N. A greenhouse lysimeter study was initiated in order to quantify some of the sinks into which N from sludge applications might move. For 12 weeks soil columns were treated at 3-week intervals with a surface application of 2.5 cm of liquid sewage sludge. During each 3-day interval 2.5 cm of water was applied to: (i) soil receiving no sludge (Soil-2.5), (ii) soil receiving sludge (Sludge-2.5), and (iii) soil planted to Coastal bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.) receiving sludge (Grass-2.5). Five centimeters of water was added to soil + grass + sludge (Sludge-5) during each 3-day interval. Another treatment was used to encourage a nitrification-denitrification cycle. This treatment (Grass-F) was identical to Grass-2.5 except that during each third week sufficient water was added to bring the 3-week total to the same as that in Grass-5. Provisions were made to collect the leachate for NO3-N analysis and to measure NH3 volatilization from the sludge.

The average loss of N as NH3 was 36% of the applied NH4-N in the Soil-2.5 treatment and 24% in the three grass treatments. This represented 4.9 and 3.3%, respectively, of the total N applied. The Grass-5 treatment resulted in the maximum NO3-N leaching loss (5.4% of the applied N). The Grass-F treatment did not result in reduced NO3-N leaching. Grass removed 10.3% of the applied N. From 52 to 64% of the applied N remained in the sludge crust on the soil surface.

Key Words: nitrate leaching • NH3 volatilization


NOTES

1 A contribution from the Univ. of Georgia Agr. Exp. Sta., College Station, Athens, 30602.

2 Formerly Graduate Research Assistant, Agron. Dep., Univ. of Georgia, presently Agronomist, TVA, Muscle Shoals, Ala. 35660 and Professor of Agronomy, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, respectively.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1974 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.