HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (36) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hao, X. Articles by Travis, G. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hao, X. Articles by Travis, G. R. Agricola Articles by Hao, X. Articles by Travis, G. R. Related Collections Nutrient Management Air Pollution Animal Waste Ground Water Quality

TECHNICAL REPORT
ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS AND TRACE GASES

Greenhouse Gas Emissions during Cattle Feedlot Manure Composting

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1

Corresponding author (haoxy{at}em.agr.ca)

Received for publication May 17, 2000. The emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) during feedlot manure composting reduces the agronomic value of the final compost and increases the greenhouse effect. A study was conducted to determine whether GHG emissions are affected by composting method. Feedlot cattle manure was composted with two aeration methods—passive (no turning) and active (turned six times). Carbon lost in the forms of CO₂ and CH₄ was 73.8 and 6.3 kg C Mg^-1 manure for the passive aeration treatment and 168.0 and 8.1 kg C Mg^-1 manure for the active treatment. The N loss in the form of N₂O was 0.11 and 0.19 kg N Mg^-1 manure for the passive and active treatments. Fuel consumption to turn and maintain the windrow added a further 4.4 kg C Mg^-1 manure for the active aeration treatment. Since CH₄ and N₂O are 21 and 310 times more harmful than CO₂ in their global warming effect, the total GHG emission expressed as CO₂–C equivalent was 240.2 and 401.4 kg C Mg^-1 manure for passive and active aeration. The lower emission associated with the passive treatment was mainly due to the incomplete decomposition of manure and a lower gas diffusion rate. In addition, turning affected N transformation and transport in the windrow profile, which contributed to higher N₂O emissions for the active aeration treatment. Gas diffusion is an important factor controlling GHG emissions. Higher GHG concentrations in compost windrows do not necessarily mean higher production or emission rates.

Abbreviations: GHG, greenhouse gas

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Brown, C. Kruger, and S. Subler Greenhouse Gas Balance for Composting Operations J. Environ. Qual., June 23, 2008; 37(4): 1396 - 1410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.J. Hellebrand and G.W. Schade Carbon monoxide from composting due to thermal oxidation of biomass. J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 592 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Amlinger, S. Peyr, and C. Cuhls Green house gas emissions from composting and mechanical biological treatment Waste Management Research, February 1, 2008; 26(1): 47 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Xu, X. Hao, K. Stanford, T. A. McAllister, F. J. Larney, and J. Wang Greenhouse Gas Emissions during Co-Composting of Calf Mortalities with Manure J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1914 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. J. Larney, K. E. Buckley, X. Hao, and W. P. McCaughey Fresh, Stockpiled, and Composted Beef Cattle Feedlot Manure: Nutrient Levels and Mass Balance Estimates in Alberta and Manitoba J. Environ. Qual., August 9, 2006; 35(5): 1844 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. B. Ferguson, J. A. Nienaber, R. A. Eigenberg, and B. L. Woodbury Long-Term Effects of Sustained Beef Feedlot Manure Application on Soil Nutrients, Corn Silage Yield, and Nutrient Uptake J. Environ. Qual., August 9, 2005; 34(5): 1672 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Hao, P. S. Mir, M. A. Shah, and G. R. Travis Influence of Canola and Sunflower Diet Amendments on Cattle Feedlot Manure J. Environ. Qual., July 5, 2005; 34(4): 1439 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Hao, F. J. Larney, C. Chang, G. R. Travis, C. K. Nichol, and E. Bremer The Effect of Phosphogypsum on Greenhouse Gas Emissions during Cattle Manure Composting J. Environ. Qual., April 20, 2005; 34(3): 774 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. N. Miller and E. D. Berry Cattle Feedlot Soil Moisture and Manure Content: I. Impacts on Greenhouse Gases, Odor Compounds, Nitrogen Losses, and Dust J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2005; 34(2): 644 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Pierzynski and K. A. Gehl Plant Nutrient Issues for Sustainable Land Application J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2005; 34(1): 18 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Hao, C. Chang, and F. J. Larney Carbon, Nitrogen Balances and Greenhouse Gas Emission during Cattle Feedlot Manure Composting J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 37 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]