HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shiowatana, J. Articles by Samphao, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shiowatana, J. Articles by Samphao, A. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Shiowatana, J. Articles by Samphao, A. Related Collections Heavy Metals Soil Pollution Soil Analysis

TECHNICAL REPORT
Heavy Metals in the Environment

Fractionation of Arsenic in Soil by a Continuous-Flow Sequential Extraction Method

^a Dep. of Chemistry, Mahidol Univ., Rama VI Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
^b Centre for Soil and Environmental Quality, Soil and Physical Sciences Group, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln Univ., Canterbury, New Zealand

* Corresponding author (scysw{at}mahidol.ac.th)

Received for publication October 23, 2000. Batch sequential extraction techniques for fractionating metals or metalloids in soils are time consuming and subject to several potential errors. The development of a continuous-flow sequential extraction method for soil As is described and assessed, having the benefits of simplicity, rapidity, less risk of contamination, and less vulnerability to changes in extraction conditions compared with traditional batch methods. The validated method was used to fractionate soil As using water, NaHCO₃, NaOH, and HCl, followed by digestion of the residue with HNO₃ and HF acids. The extracts and digests were analyzed for As by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Good recoveries of total soil As (97–115%) were obtained and fractionation data generally comparable with those obtained using conventional batch techniques. Soils from a tin-mining area in Thailand and soils from As-contaminated cattle (Bos taurus) dip sites in Australia were used to test the applicability of the method, and to demonstrate the usefulness of the extractogram obtained. The ability to produce detailed extractograms for As and other elements (Al, Fe, and Ca) enabled an examination of elemental associations in individual fractions. With the exception of As extracted with HCl, the extractograms generally support previous suggestions of the likely forms or associations of As present in the different soil fractions.

Abbreviations: CRM, certified reference material • GFAAS, graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry • SRM, standard reference material