JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, D. T.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, D. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ground Water Quality
Journal of Environmental Quality 32:490-499 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Ground Water Quality

Surface and Subsurface Geologic Risk Factors to Ground Water Affecting Brownfield Redevelopment Potential

Martin M. Kaufman*,a, Kent S. Murrayb and Daniel T. Rogersc

a Dep. of Earth and Resource Science, Univ. of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI, 48502
b Dep. of Natural Sciences, Univ. of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI, 48128
c Amsted Inc., 205 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, IL, 60601

* Corresponding author (martyk{at}umflint.edu)

Received for publication May 2, 2002. A model is created for assessing the redevelopment potential of brownfields. The model is derived from a space and time conceptual framework that identifies and measures the surface and subsurface risk factors present at brownfield sites. The model then combines these factors with a contamination extent multiplier at each site to create an index of redevelopment potential. Results from the application of the model within an urbanized watershed demonstrate clear differences between the redevelopment potential present within five different near-surface geologic units, with those units containing clay being less vulnerable to subsurface contamination. With and without the extent multiplier, the total risk present at the brownfield sites within all the geologic units is also strongly correlated to the actual costs of remediation. Thus, computing the total surface and subsurface risk within a watershed can help guide the remediation efforts at broad geographic scales, and prioritize the locations for redevelopment.

Abbreviations: SIC, Standard Industrial Classification


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 377-382. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.