JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schrader, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schrader, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, T. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schrader, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, T. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remediation
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Organic Compounds
Published in J. Environ. Qual. 33:1202-1209 (2004).
© ASA, CSSA, SSSA
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Bioremediation and Biodegradation

Coupled Abiotic–Biotic Mineralization of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT) in Soil Slurry

Paul S. Schradera and Thomas F. Hessb,*

a Department of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
b Center for Hazardous Waste Remediation and Research, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-0904

* Corresponding author (tfhess{at}uidaho.edu).

Received for publication July 31, 2003. The explosive 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) is a contaminant of soils and ground waters worldwide. To help alleviate such environmental contamination, we investigated a coupled abiotic–biotic treatment scheme for remediating TNT-contaminated soil in slurry solutions. Two types of soil were used (sandy and silt loam) to simulate different soils that might be found at actual sites. These soils were subsequently contaminated with 5000 mg kg–1 TNT. Mineralization of TNT was initially optimized for minimum reactant use (Fe3+ and H2O2) and maximum soil slurry percentage (percent solids) using modified Fenton reactions conducted in the absence of light followed by the addition of an uncharacterized aerobic biomass. Greater than 97% TNT degradation was observed under optimum reaction conditions for both soils. Using two optimum reactant concentrations for each soil, coupled abiotic–biotic reactions showed an increase in TNT mineralization, from 41 to 73% and 34 to 64% in the sandy soil (10 and 20% slurry, respectively, 1470 mM H2O2), and increases from 12 to 23% and 13 to 28% in the silt loam soil (5% slurry, 294 and 1470 mM H2O2, respectively). These results show promise in the use of combined abiotic–biotic treatment processes for soils contaminated with high concentrations of TNT.

Abbreviations: HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography • TNT, 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene • WAS, waste-activated sludge


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2004 33: 1177-1182. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.