JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 5 January 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:390-393 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0036
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ige, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Guenter, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ige, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Guenter, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ige, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Guenter, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Agricultural Systems
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Animal Waste

SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

Phosphorus Fractions in Manure from Growing Pigs Receiving Diets Containing Micronized Peas and Supplemental Enzymes

D. V. Igea, O. O. Akinremia,*, C. M. Nyachotib and W. Guenterb

a Department of Soil Science
b Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2

* Corresponding author (akinremi{at}ms.umanitoba.ca)

Received for publication February 1, 2005. Different livestock feeds manipulations have been reported to reduce the total P concentration in manure. Information on the influence of these dietary manipulation strategies on the forms of P in manure is, however, limited. This study was, therefore, conducted to investigate the effect of diet manipulation through feed micronization and enzyme supplementation on the forms of P in swine manure. Eight growing pigs were fed four diets: barley–raw pea (BRP), barley–micronized pea (BMP), barley–raw pea with enzyme (BRPE), and barley–micronized pea with enzyme (BMPE) in a 4 x 4 Latin square design. Because we are interested in the effect of enzyme cocktail and pea micronization on manure P, we did not reduce the non-phytate P with enzyme addition in this study. The fecal material and urine were collected and analyzed for total P. Fecal material was fractionated to determine the total P in H2O-, NaHCO3–, NaOH-, and HCl-extractable fractions. The total P in the residual fractions was also determined. About 98% of the total P excreted by the pigs was found in the fecal material. Inclusion of micronized pea in pig diet did not have any significant effect (p > 0.1) on either the total P or the different P fractions in the manure. The labile P (the sum of H2O-P and NaHCO3–P) was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) by the addition of enzyme to swine diets. Pigs fed the BRPE and BMPE had 14 and 18% lower labile P, respectively, compared with pigs fed the BRP. Enzyme addition to pig diets reduced not only the total P in manure, but also the labile P fraction, which is of great environmental concern. Thus, the potential of P loss to runoff and the subsequent eutrophication can be reduced by enzyme addition to pig diets.

Abbreviations: BMP, barley–micronized pea • BMPE, barley–micronized pea with enzyme • BRP, barley–raw pea • BRPE, barley–raw pea with enzyme







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.