HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Young, E. O. Articles by Briggs, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Young, E. O. Articles by Briggs, R. D. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Young, E. O. Articles by Briggs, R. D. Related Collections Biogeochemical Processes Nutrients Nutrient Management Ground Water Quality

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Landscape and Watershed Processes

Phosphorus Concentrations in Soil and Subsurface Water: A Field Study among Cropland and Riparian Buffers

^a Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Univ. of Vermont, Hills Agricultural Science Building, Burlington, VT 05405
^b Dep. of Forest and Natural Resources Management, SUNY-ESF, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210

^* Corresponding author (eoyoung{at}uvm.edu).

Received for publication October 2, 2006. Riparian buffers can be effective at removing phosphorus (P) in overland flow, but their influence on subsurface P loading is not well known. Phosphorus concentrations in the soil, soil solution, and shallow ground water of 16 paired cropland-buffer plots were characterized during 2004 and 2005. The sites were located at two private dairy farms in Central New York on silt and gravelly silt loams (Aeric Endoaqualfs, Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts, Fluvaquentic Eutrudepts, Glossaquic Hapludalfs, and Glossic Hapludalfs). It was hypothesized that P availability (sodium acetate extractable-P) and soil-landscape variability would affect P release to the soil solution and shallow ground water. Results showed that P availability tended to be greater in crop fields relative to paired buffer plots. Soil P was a good indicator of soil solution dissolved (<0.45 µm) molybdate-reactive P (DRP) concentrations among plots, but was not independently effective at predicting ground water DRP concentrations. Mean ground water DRP in corn fields ranged from 20 to 80 µg L^–1, with lower concentrations in hay and buffer plots. More imperfectly drained crop fields and buffers tended to have greater average DRP, particulate (0.45 µm) reactive P (PRP), and dissolved unreactive P (DUP) concentrations in ground water. Soil organic matter and 50-cm depth soil solution DRP in buffers jointly explained 75% of the average buffer ground water DRP variability. Results suggest that buffers were relatively effective at reducing soil solution and shallow ground water DRP concentrations, but their impact on particulate and organic P in ground water was less clear.

Abbreviations: DRP, dissolved reactive phosphorus • PRP, particulate reactive phosphorus • TDP, total dissolved phosphorus • DUP, dissolved unreactive phosphorus • WTD, depth to the water table