HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sistani, K. R. Articles by Oldham, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sistani, K. R. Articles by Oldham, J. L. Agricola Articles by Sistani, K. R. Articles by Oldham, J. L. Related Collections Water Quality Phosphorus Runoff Turfgrass Nutrient Management

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Managing Broiler Litter Application Rate and Grazing to Decrease Watershed Runoff Losses

^a USDA-ARS, Animal Waste Management Research Unit, Bowling Green, KY 42104
^b USDA-ARS, U. S. Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI 53707
^c Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State Univ., Starkville, MS 39762

^* Corresponding author (karamat.sistani{at}ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication April 18, 2007. Pasture management and broiler litter application rate are critical factors influencing the magnitude of nutrients being transported by runoff from fields. We investigated the impact of pasture management and broiler litter application rate on nutrient runoff from bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) pastures. The experiment was conducted on a Ruston fine sandy loam with a factorial arrangement on 21 large paddocks. Runoff water was collected from natural rainfall events from 2001 to 2003. Runoff water and soil samples were analyzed for nutrients and sediments. Runoff was generally greater (29%) from grazed than hayed pastures regardless of the litter application rate. There was greater inorganic N in the runoff from grazed paddocks when litter rate was based on N rather than P. The mean total P loss per runoff event for all treatments ranged from 7 to 45 g ha^–1 and the grazed treatment with litter applied on N basis had the greatest total P loss. Total dissolved P was the dominant P fraction in the runoff, ranging from 85% to 93% of the total P. The soluble reactive P was greater for treatments with litter applied on N basis regardless of pasture management. Runoff total sediments were greater for N-based litter application compared to those which received litter on P basis. Our results indicate that litter may be applied on N basis if the pasture is hayed and the soil P is low. In contrast, litter rates should be based on a P-basis if pasture is grazed.