HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Parkin, T. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Parkin, T. B. Agricola Articles by Parkin, T. B. Related Collections Air Pollution

Effect of Sampling Frequency on Estimates of Cumulative Nitrous Oxide Emissions

USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab., 2110 University Blvd., Ames, IA 50011

^* Corresponding author (tim.parkin{at}ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication June 20, 2007. It is generally recognized that soil N₂O emissions can exhibit pronounced day-to-day variations; however, measurements of soil N₂O flux with soil chambers typically are done only at discrete points in time. This study evaluated the impact of sampling frequency on the precision of cumulative N₂O flux estimates calculated from field measurements. Automated chambers were deployed in a corn/soybean field and used to measure soil N₂O fluxes every 6 h from 25 Feb. 2006 through 11 Oct. 2006. The chambers were located in two positions relative to the fertilizer bands—directly over a band or between fertilizer bands. Sampling frequency effects on cumulative N₂O–N flux estimation were assessed using a jackknife technique where populations of N₂O fluxes were constructed from the average daily fluxes measured in each chamber. These test populations were generated by selecting measured flux values at regular time intervals ranging from 1 to 21 d. It was observed that as sampling interval increased from 7 to 21 d, variances associated with cumulative flux estimates increased. At relatively frequent sampling intensities (i.e., once every 3 d) N₂O–N flux estimates were within ±10% of the expected value at both sampling positions. As the time interval between sampling was increased, the deviation in estimated cumulative N₂O flux increased, such that sampling once every 21 d yielded estimates within +60% and –40% of the actual cumulative N₂O flux. The variance of potential fluxes associated with the between-band positions was less than the over-band position, indicating that the underlying temporal variability impacts the efficacy of a given sampling protocol.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. K. Jarecki, T. B. Parkin, A. S. K. Chan, J. L. Hatfield, and R. Jones Comparison of DAYCENT-Simulated and Measured Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a Corn Field J. Environ. Qual., August 8, 2008; 37(5): 1685 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]